.

Opinion: Commack - Get Out And Vote To Change The Status Quo

Get out and vote if you want to see change in Commack.

 Tomorrow is election day and the chance for Commack residents to vote on the proposed school budget and the candidates running for the school board (the “Board”). It is my sincere hope that have been informative and have provided people with facts to help them make an informed and intelligent decision before voting.

I also suggest you read the following informative articles:Commack Schools Need Priorities, LI School Budgets Call for Staff Cuts, What's UP with School Taxes? 

It is imperative that everyone exercise their right to vote tomorrow and have their voice heard. As noted by Newsday reporter John Hildebrand, “fewer than 15 percent of registered voters participate in school elections generally. In some districts, less than 100 votes can decide the outcome of more than $100 million in spending. Voters have never had as much leverage over school spending as they will enjoy in Tuesday's elections.” 

I for one believe changes are needed here in Commack because the numbers show that the district has been fiscally irresponsible. The district’s spending is indefensible considering the tough economic times of the past several years. The facts show that from 2006 to date, during which a majority of the Board has been in office, the Board approved budget increases totaling nearly 31.6% and tax levy increases totaling approx. 27.4%. Teachers’ salaries alone have increased over 40% (not including benefits), which works out to nearly 49% when compounded. During this same period inflation rose only a total of approx. 16% and school enrollment actually decreased -1.4%. As a result, the past six years has seen Commack’s school budget increase at almost twice the rate of inflation.  This has led to district’s cost to educate each student to rise nearly 37% from $17,303 in 2006/07 to $23,660 for 2012/13.

Although the public cannot vote on school district employee contracts, it is important to realize the public indirectly does so when they vote on school budgets – as those budgets pay for the contract raises. Commack’s School District instructional salaries alone now make up 77% of the Budget (not incl. benefits) and the it has 32 administrators earning over $123,000

The contract extension the Board gave Superintendent James last year, after only just one year on the job, provided him with a 6.5% raise ($17,000) and 10 extra vacation days and three “other holidays” (boosting his total vacation days to 40, of which he can request up to 30 to be paid in cash each year). The extra days he was awarded was plainly a means of providing him an indirect monetary benefit. 1/220th of Dr. James’ salary is $1,243.63, so the 10 vacation days are worth $12,436.30 and 3 more holidays are worth $3,730.89. 

This year the school district could have saved $3.7 million of the $5.2 million budget gap with a district wide pay freeze. However, while other district employees have agreed to a freeze, so far the teacher’s union has apparently refused to make any such concession, even though numerous other teacher unions throughout Long Island have done so, including the Smithtown teachers’ contract and Northport.

Indeed, “Brentwood officials said many planned cuts may be avoided if employees agree to lower compensation. Many local teacher unions already have taken that step. Regional union representatives said newly negotiated raises average 1 to 1.5 percent a year, compared with 3 or 3.5 percent a few years ago. Representatives add that annual "step" increases built into pay schedules are being canceled or postponed in many cases.” 

Here in Commack, salary concessions would have likely: (1) remove any necessity for a school tax increase;(2) saved all the employees and teachers that were slated to be fired (except those being let go due to reduced enrollment); and (3) saved all classes and programs from being cut under the proposed budget. In essence, the District is asking the community to support a budget that cuts kids’ classes, programs and teachers, so it can afford to pay the higher salaries which the Board approved.  I find it hard to fathom that any reasonable person could not take issue with this. 

I also find it hard to understand how the Commack PTA can support the proposed budget considering the budget is taking programs, clubs and teachers away from our children. Isn’t the PTA supposed to be looking out for the best interest of our children? Yet has the PTA ever stood up against and questioned the district’s fiscal irresponsibility and wasteful spending? Has the PTA ever recommended the community vote NO to any proposed budget? The answer is No. Instead, they have continuously facilitated the status quo.

The PTA’s complicity is evidenced by the e-mail blast that the PTA sent out yesterday telling the community to vote for the budget and also implying the community should not to elect Mr. Fusco to the Board because he’s opposes the budget. The PTA disingenuously fails to explain that Mr. Fusco stated that he could not support the budget because it gives raises to staff while cutting programs for children. Is that unreasonable? Shouldn’t the PTA’s position be the same? Why is the PTA not questioning Ms. Guber’s record over the past 6 years? What has she done to warrant a third 3-year term? How can the PTA urge people to vote for Ms. Guber when she believes it's better to keep overpaying employees rather than putting the money towards classes and programs? The PTA’s e-mail is also entirely improper and unethical, as the PTA is not permitted to endorse any Board candidates. By doing so the PTA had now impugned their own credibility and shown their true colors insofar as they are not acting independently from the District, but are plainly nothing more than an extension of it. 

The PTA has also adopted the same scare tactics the district uses, i.e., if the budget is not approved then the kids will suffer because then there will be more cuts.  So now the PTA has chosen to point the same proverbial gun to our kids’ heads that the District has repeatedly used every year to get the budget passed. Yet, every year we are back in the same place facing the same situation. How many times are we going to be held hostage by this hollow argument that perpetuates the never ending cycle of wasteful spending that always leads to budget increases, higher taxes, program cuts and teacher layoffs? A defeat of the budget on May 15 will not “decimate our schools” or put Commack on austerity. To the contrary, it will create an opportunity, before a second vote is held, for more discussion and negotiations with the unions, who will then be constrained to make concessions or see more of its members lose their jobs.  The plain truth is that the district employees have it within their power to avoid the consequences of an austerity budget, but will only be compelled to do so if the budget fails.

The voices of the Commack community need to be heard. Sadly, last year only 4,500 eligible voters turned out of over 20,000. This year we should not let 4,500 people decide the fate of over 20,000. If you have no problem with the past six-years’ 32% increase in the school budget, 27% increase in property taxes, and the fiscally irresponsible way the district awards salaries to its employees at the expense of making cuts to classes, programs, and teachers, then go ahead and vote for the budget and Ms. Guber. 

If you have had enough of these unjustified increases and wasteful spending of your tax dollars and want to see: (1) our children be put first; (2) a stop to student program cuts; (3) better education for students; (4) common sense fiscal responsibility; (5) more transparency; (6) school district costs controlled; and (7) a stop to rising school property taxes; then Vote for Change by voting No to the budget and Yes to Dan Fusco.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

John Gruber May 16, 2012 at 12:40 AM
and Art, lets be honest, we all would like to pay the teachers as much as we can they are hard working people no questions asked. But the profession they're in only allows for them to make so much, at some point it start's to hurt the students, as classes are STILL being cut, even if the budget passes. That can't happen.
RL May 16, 2012 at 02:50 AM
The people have spoken! Congratulations on getting it right! Debbie congrats on another four years of serving our community!
RL May 16, 2012 at 03:02 AM
Sorry three years my mistake
susan r May 16, 2012 at 11:53 AM
Yeah, Dr. James our superintendent still gets his $8,000 car allowance every year!!!! (Thank God the board approved his contract!!!)
susan r May 16, 2012 at 11:57 AM
BTW - for those of you who don't know Dr. James probably gets the car allowance because he lives far away - oh never mind, I forgot he lives in Commack. All the clubs that were cut and asst. coaches that were eliminated probably had to because gas prices have gone up and it is expensive to drive a 6 mile radius to all the schools from time-to-time.
Just The Facts May 16, 2012 at 12:44 PM
Its not worth discussing. There are obviously a lot of people in this district (or distract as some pro budgeteers posted) that have more money than brains. Its either that or they are just so pertified that little Johnny or baby Mary jane is going to be left behind if there are an additional 1.365789785462830946 children in his/her class. Oh well cest le vie.
Met May 16, 2012 at 12:47 PM
Susan r, he does not get a car allowance to travel from his home to work. That would be a violation of federal income tax laws. He gets the allowance because he must travel to various locations on a daily basis in conjunction with his job responsibilities. Employees of all businesses get this same perk if their job description requires it.
Just The Facts May 16, 2012 at 12:52 PM
Its a perk. If the district (distract) were interested in saving money, they could lease a car (green to help the environment of course), give the big guy the keys and let him drive all over Long Island if he so desires for less than $8,000.
Just The Facts May 16, 2012 at 01:11 PM
Also Met, since we are above violating Federal tax laws, couldnt we just reimburse him at the IRS per mile allowable rate for actual miles travelled? Those are just a couple of ideas about things that organizations that arent on the public dole do to save a buck.
Art Vandalay May 16, 2012 at 01:40 PM
It's real good to see that this town has more people that know what they are talking about than those who haven't a clue...THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN!
Joe C. May 16, 2012 at 01:43 PM
Yes..the people have spoken and the people will pay $$$$$....
Art Vandalay May 16, 2012 at 02:11 PM
And your side will continue to speak nonsense behind a computer screen, maybe if a smarter less arrogant SOB would have been running you would have stood a chance. Guys a jabroni..
Just The Facts May 16, 2012 at 02:16 PM
Art Vandalay!!!!!!!!!!!! Youre the guy calling the District "the Distract" . And you are calling someone else a jabroni??????????????? Good grief. And its not like the "a" and the "i" are right next to eachother on the keyboard.
John Gruber May 16, 2012 at 02:18 PM
only in commack will people tell you to "move" because you're not ok with grossly overpaying school staff at the expense of kids
John Gruber May 16, 2012 at 02:22 PM
and when your old and you kids have kids, your kids will ask you why they're stuck footing the bill and you can tell them it's because you decided it ok was to give more money to staff than the budget would allow for, knowing full well the money wasn't there to pay them
John Gruber May 16, 2012 at 02:25 PM
I don't care how you spin it. The kids are gonna end up paying for people's incompetence. Someone's gonna have to pay the $5.2million and climbing debt the school owes. Hope you got an explanation for your kids when they're asked why they're paying for it.
John Gruber May 16, 2012 at 02:29 PM
the fact that there is a solution so that everyone is happy (staff concessions which will do more than just save the classes that were cut, probably some teachers to) but we decided to just keep spending money we don't have tells you that most people in this town don''t think with their brain or just don't have one
IMHO May 16, 2012 at 02:31 PM
Lets face it, we all took a step backwards yesterday.
Art Vandalay May 16, 2012 at 02:31 PM
don't worry about my kids, I'm going to be there for them because of the education I received from Commack and they won't need help either because of the education they will be receiving from Commack..
NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH May 16, 2012 at 02:32 PM
JD: We have more money BECAUSE we have brains. The YESes are done with you all. BTW, learn how to spell, all of you. You detract from your points when you can't spell. (Can't even take you seriously.)
Just The Facts May 16, 2012 at 02:34 PM
Hell yeah
Just The Facts May 16, 2012 at 02:35 PM
Just dont teach them how to spell "district" Art
John Gruber May 16, 2012 at 02:36 PM
the only people who don't have a clue are ones who think the district is ok as it is. COMPLETELY CLUELESS
John Gruber May 16, 2012 at 03:50 PM
Art even when your gone, at this rate your kids will still be paying off the debt WE are racking up. And there are plenty of places that offer good education while still maintaining fiscal responsibility. It's not impossible and we then we wouldn't have to choose between a huge debt and classes. win.win. It's just a fact, the school will not survive if something is not done
John Gruber May 16, 2012 at 03:51 PM
Really? Because brains should tell you we can't spend money we don't have. And the millions commack is losing from year to year says that's exactly the case
Graduated Student May 16, 2012 at 07:00 PM
Lets all put our differences aside, the voting is over. The budget passed. We know who won and who lost and that cannot change. I just hope commack schools can improve this year, by not cutting anymore teachers, student programs and budgets for paper/necessities. For those who haven't been a student in the past 4 years this has happened every year for the past 3-4 years and the budget has also passed for the past 5+ years. When you vote yes (like we always do) teachers will still get cut, sports and clubs still get cut, teachers and students have to keep cutting back on paper, school lunch money goes up. So, by voting yes all these things will happen and your taxes will go up. Next year when the voting comes around and they want to raise taxes again...Just remember what you expected when you voted yes in this years vote. Remember what they promised you and how they lied to you about not cutting programs and teachers. It will happen. I guarantee it because it always happens. Is this school a great district, absolutely. What makes it a successful school district starts with the ambitious students and their parents. Students want to do well and go to a great college. Just like their parents do. I loved my time at CHS (2010 grad) and it was awesome. But voting yes or no on a budget will NOT change whether it is a great school district or not.
John Gruber May 16, 2012 at 07:25 PM
I've been preaching this since day one. But people believe what they wish to believe
susan r May 17, 2012 at 12:00 AM
John there are people in this world that just blindly follow, they believe the nonsense they are feed (your children will suffer) it is a battle that will only be won once it is too late. They just don't get, they will not even attempt to understand what we are saying - it is a lost cause sadly. I am truly disheartened by this whole thing.
Retired May 20, 2012 at 11:03 PM
Commack HS ranked only 267th in the Country..How come the Board and Supt. are tooting their horn over this ranking? What they only pay attention to the reports they like? Show's this ranking stuff is all nonsense.. http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/05/20/our-report-card-on-the-1-000-that-make-the-grade.html
ergodic May 22, 2012 at 05:15 PM
Musings on the May 15 vote. (1) If the 4700 budget votes comprised the total # of voters, and if there are 20,000+ registered voters, then about 1 of 5 "people" spoke at the May 15 vote.. (2) 235 of those voting on the budget did not vote for trustee. The result would have been the same even if they had. . (3) At least 289 of those voting "yes" on the budget (about 10% of the 2977 "yes" votes) cast their trustee vote for Mr Fusco. (4) An increase of 2215 in the turnout -with 60% voting for Mr Fusco- would have produced a virtual tie in the Trustee election. To attract this size turnout (6915 voters) probably would have required more than an offer of a free breakfast. (5) The possibility of expanding the membership of the BOE should be considered.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »