.

5,000 Local Residents Stand up to Sanitary District 2

Gathered on the Hempstead Town Clerk's desk were the signatures of 5,000 residents of Sanitary District Tow who're ready for a change.

Packed into Hempstead's Town Hall this past Monday, local residents left stack upon stack of petitions on the clerk's desk, threatening to spill over onto the floor. Gathered on the clerk's desk were the signatures of 5,000 residents of Sanitary District 2 who are ready for a change. These residents want to get rid of their special taxing district, and for good reason.

Residents for Efficient Special Districts (RESD) and the Long Island Progressive Coalition (LIPC) have been assisting local residents in a concentrated effort to dissolve Sanitary District 2, which would turn over to the Town of Hempstead sanitation service for the hamlets of Baldwin, Roosevelt, South Hempstead and parts of Uniondale, Rockville Centre and Freeport. If successful, this would not only be the first successful dissolution of a special district under New York’s new Government Reorganization and Citizen Empowerment Act, but also the largest effort ever undertaken under the new law.

"Sani 2", as it's known to locals, charges hundreds of extra dollars annually to provide the same sanitation service as neighboring districts. As one of the more than 200 special taxing districts in Nassau County, Sani 2 is a relic of the long past days when Nassau was a patchwork of farming communities, helping give local residents some of the highest property taxes in the state.

While the way the districts operate might be confusing, the ways we can benefit from dissolution is simple. Small districts like Sani 2 are unable to take advantage of "economies of scale": they have to pay more for supplies and materials, and have to have their own set of accounting and management staff. In the private sector, companies would go out business if they were run like this, but in Sani 2, they can always just raise the tax rate to make up the difference. Unfortunately, with no real oversight, the burden on local taxpayers can continue to grow.

Special taxing districts face less oversight than other municipalities, and in Sani 2, it shows. In 2001, the district’s Board of Commissioners used $184,000 in district funds to purchase a building, without first giving a reason for the purchase. This took place while Sani 2 was already saddled with $330,000 in debt.

Even worse, as many of us were struggling to pay our tax bills, in 2003 Sani 2 bureaucrats spent $3,195 of taxpayer money to attend a New Orleans conference. The trip included a $676 tab for dinner at Morton's Steakhouse, a high-end restaurant near the city’s French Quarter. Sheltered from any real public scrutiny, Sani 2 managers enjoyed a good time on the public dime.

With no oversight, no rules governing conflicts of interest or ethics, and an "election" process that leaves most residents in the dark, should Sani 2's troubles come as a surprise? When a district's operations are shrouded in mystery, it not only allows for mismanagement, it puts workers at risk. Witness a recent discrimination lawsuit against Sani 2 management: without the checks and balances that the Town of Hempstead could provide, workers are left with few protections.

In the coming months, the voters of Sanitary District 2 will have to decide whether to create a plan to dissolve their district(a separate vote to approve the plan will come later). When homeowners will save hundreds of dollars a year and workers will see their conditions improve, who would argue against dissolution? Unsurprisingly, the loudest voices against dissolution come from the handful of bureaucrats in charge of Sani 2, who are the only people that won't benefit from the switch. Unfortunately for them, 5,000 residents have already spoken out, and their message is clear: Change starts here, on our blocks, and we're not going to let these bureaucrats stop us.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Johan Lund August 02, 2012 at 05:58 PM
Lisa is focusing her "liberal weight" on an issue that is hyper-local. How could you not call this issue "close to home"? And for someone so lambasted as a communist, Tyson seems to be advocating for some bread and butter conservative ideals: trimming bloated government and saving taxpayer money. It seems to me you and the poster above have a personal issue with Ms. Tyson that transcends both her actions and politics.
Frank August 02, 2012 at 06:45 PM
Lisa is a hypocrite. She lambasts Upstate Fracking but does not even acknowledge the environmental disaster in the Western Bays... Hypocrite.
Felix Procacci August 02, 2012 at 07:39 PM
John Lund, your right.
Happy Daze August 02, 2012 at 08:34 PM
Another blog/article highlighting the LIPC. Is there a pattern here? I figured I'd post it again since my last post was deleted.
David R. Yale August 03, 2012 at 12:28 PM
Paul, your comment is totally unsupported by any facts. In my opinion it is libelous and exposes you to legal action. You'd better hope that Ms. Tyson is forgiving. In any case, you owe her an apology.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »