.
Feedback

Flanagan, Fitzpatrick Skip Social Media Post-Sandy, Slow to Communicate

The Smithtown-area’s state delegation said they were knocked out by power loss, while neighboring officials swarmed Facebook and Twitter in the immediate aftermath.

When Superstorm Sandy knocked out power, Internet and phone to thousands in the Smithtown area, elected officials at all levels scrambled to communicate crucial info the public, often posting dozens of social media updates to inform residents left in the dark.

But in stark contrast to neighboring New York officials, county representatives and even the governor of New York, Smithtown’s state delegation of Sen. John Flanagan and Assemblyman Michael Fitzpatrick steered clear of social media and told Patch this week that it took days after the storm’s initial destruction for them to find a way to communicate with their constituents.


Flanagan, R-Smithtown, said due to the power outages he did not have access to his Smithtown Main street offices until Nov.2, five days after the storm hit. At that point, 32,674 in the area were still without power and outcry over Long Island Power Authority communication had begun to build.

“We primarily do email blasts. I’m not worried about people’s ability to get in contact with us. We had a lot of direct contact via phone,” Flanagan said.

The state senator sent out one email before Hurricane Sandy struck, and four emails between Oct. 30 through Thanksgiving Day to his list of about 24,000 constituents in his district, which includes the entire Town of Smithtown and Three Village area and portions of Northport.

Fitzpatrick, R-St. James, said his offices were without power for six days after the storm, and that he had no generator or secondary location to work from.

“When the power came on Saturday the answering machine was full. While I was here, the phone was ringing. I didn’t leave till 6 p.m. Saturday night,” Fitzpatrick said.

The assemblyman said he helped facilitate emergency help for residents post-Sandy, including a St. James family needing power restored immediately for their two children on ventilators.

A Swarm to Social

While Flanagan remains the only state senator on Long Island to not have a public Facebook account, neighboring Sens. Ken LaValle and Lee Zeldin used their accounts throughout the recovery, often to deliver info from LIPA on restoration efforts that the utility shared on daily conference calls with elected officials.

LaValle spokesman Drew Biondo said Facebook enabled them to have two-way conversation with constituents. With many locals without power and phone, scores were using their smartphones to check news sources, email and social media for info.

Biondo said LaValle’s office also shied away from email blasts, but did use email to communicate with those not using social media.

"There are people who are never going to be on Facebook, so it's important to have other lines of communication,” Biondo said.

Twitter was also a major driver of information during the storm, and elected officials including U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, Suffolk County executive Steve Bellone and most notably Gov. Andrew Cuomo posted updates almost hourly.

“It was critical to be open, accessible and a conduit for information to constituents and important parties like LIPA and power restoration crews,” said Suffolk Legis. John Kennedy Jr., another local official who leaned heavily on social media to communicate.

Kennedy, R-Nesconset, said he spent days after Sandy living out of his Hauppauge office in the North County Complex on Route 347. He gathered his staff, interns and family members to begin posting emergency information and LIPA updates by Oct. 31.

“We were putting up stuff on Facebook as it was a way for people to see that we were open and we offered ourselves for charging and warming purposes,” Kennedy said.

Once the legislator’s office phone lines were up and working on Nov. 1, Kennedy’s wife Leslie said the staff answered 616 calls between 5:15 a.m. and 1 a.m. Phone calls also poured into Smithtown Supervisor Patrick Vecchio’s office and its Public Safety department, both which were open and accepting calls post-Hurricane Sandy due to back-up generators.

Putting Town First

Fitzpatrick this week defended his performance following the storm, and said the most crucial info for residents to follow came from the town.

“The best way to get information is to go through the Town of Smithtown’s website rather than every public official looking to be the saviour,” he said. “I would tell you that one central agency should be disseminating information, so you avoid misinformation.”

It is a sentiment Smithtown Town Supervisor Pat Vecchio backed. He said the town’s Public Safety Department was accepting phone calls and were in the best position to respond due to equipment and resources – two things higher elected officials were without.

When it comes social media, Fitzpatrick said he has his concerns about using social media to reach residents, fearing adding his voice to a stream of potential misinformation and rumors.

The politician, who along with Flanagan handily won re-election in November, added that if post-Sandy analysis shows social media proved a good communication tool for officials he would consider changing his opinion.

Flanagan simply said he does not think his constituents have trouble reaching him.

State Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, R-Rockville Centre, declined to comment on his colleagues’ social media use.

According to a study on social media and political engagement published in October by the Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project, 20 percent of social media user follow elected officials or political candidates. Among them, the number is higher for Republicans, the party of Flanagan and Fitzpatrick, with 32 percent of conservative Republicans using social media to follow officials.

As for Kennedy, the Suffolk legislator said there is no excuse for poor communication.

“We get elected to represent our constituents and they need us to be available all the time, especially in a crisis like that. I don’t know how anyone could not. For me, that would be an irresponsibility,” he said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Commack Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Retired May 22, 2013 at 01:17 pm
Congrats to Jim and Steve, but most off all congrats to the Commack Community for having the wisdomRead More to elect them.
MJS May 22, 2013 at 10:10 am
Get ready Mary Jo, Dr. James, CTA, and PTA.. Change is Coming!
GM May 21, 2013 at 11:29 pm
Well run Gentlemen! Get some sleep now.... you guys have a lot of work to do.
LaJa May 21, 2013 at 09:03 pm
They change the name occasionally but they are and will always be TaxPac
LaJa May 21, 2013 at 09:02 pm
Simply stating that you are not aware of who you are supporting is ecactly why the rest of us areRead More relentless in our efforts to keep them out of our community. For the sake of your kids, your property value and future (both near and distant) research this Group. You will be shocked to read the Exact words used by the group you support in TaxPac literature. Then read about the effects of their policies on the communities the infiltrate. And how long it takes these communities to recover once they are all voted out of office.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 04:45 pm
LaJa. First, I don't hide behind initials or some fake name. I can't take you seriously when youRead More won't reveal who you really are. Secondly, I am not part of any group whatsoever. I do not need others telling me how to think. There ARE citizens in this town who are not happy with the current board and their ways, who do not need to be part of an organization of some sort to try and initiate change. Finally, it's funny you accuse me of being a part of something that I don't even know what it is. I've never heard of TaxPac in my life.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 08:18 am
Last night, I had quite the email exchange with members of the PTA Executive Committee. Not onlyRead More could they NOT provide me with an answer as to why they've chosen not to support Proposition 2, all I received was snide remarks and avoidance. Not smart or professional at all. In fact, they seem like quite the joke. I guess they are more of a social club who makes decisions about an important vote without doing their homework and then pushes that decision on the community (via street signs and phone calls to parents). I believe the public deserves a valid answer as to why they've taken their position. Unfortunately, they can't provide one. It makes me ponder if I should even bother to support the PTA in the future (as I have in the past with both my time and money). They certainly don't seem to be making decisions in the best interest of our children. It is all quite sad.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 10:53 am
Last night, I had quite the email exchange with members of the PTA Executive Committee. Not onlyRead More could they NOT provide me with an answer as to why they've chosen not to support Proposition 2, all I received was snide remarks and avoidance. Not smart or professional at all. In fact, they seem like quite the joke. I guess they are more of a social club who makes decisions about an important vote without doing their homework and then pushes that decision on the community (via street signs and phone calls to parents). I believe the public deserves a valid answer as to why they've taken their position. Unfortunately, they can't provide one. It makes me ponder if I should even bother to support the PTA in the future (as I have in the past with both my time and money). They certainly don't seem to be making decisions in the best interest of our children. Now, this morning, I hear that the PTA is telling people that they are opposed to Proposition 2 in order to keep "special interest groups" from taking over. How can parents in this community, whose children are in the system, who want to make positive change for those children, be a "special interest group"? It blows my mind, how in politics, people can twist things so badly to meet their own agendas. It is all quite sad.
Concerned Commackian May 21, 2013 at 01:34 pm
Whatever you say LaJa......whatever you say. Where is the sneaking around? Wasnt everything doneRead More according to the law? I think your goal is sensatuionalism rather than serious debate.
LaJa May 21, 2013 at 11:12 am
By the way, I am not in any way associated or affiliated with any union... If you and your groupRead More are not affiliated with TaxPac then you should know that the platform Tampellini and Hartman support, along with the sudden urgent need for 2 more board seats, is taken straight from the TaxPac play book. You can agree with them, as that is your right BUT you must also know where their rhetoric originates and educate yourselves as to what TaxPac as a group wants here on Long Island. If the TaxPac agenda was above board and positive for LI communities there would be no need for them to sneak around and attempt to gain entry into communities through back-door maneuvers like the sudden need for 2 more seats...when Fusco couldn't get in last year either..... At least know that you are being played.
Concerned Commackian May 21, 2013 at 10:39 am
Is TAXPAC a word often used by Union Shills?
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 08:19 am
Last night, I had quite the email exchange with members of the PTA Executive Committee. Not onlyRead More could they NOT provide me with an answer as to why they've chosen not to support Proposition 2, all I received was snide remarks and avoidance. Not smart or professional at all. In fact, they seem like quite the joke. I guess they are more of a social club who makes decisions about an important vote without doing their homework and then pushes that decision on the community (via street signs and phone calls to parents). I believe the public deserves a valid answer as to why they've taken their position. Unfortunately, they can't provide one. It makes me ponder if I should even bother to support the PTA in the future (as I have in the past with both my time and money). They certainly don't seem to be making decisions in the best interest of our children. It is all quite sad.
Commackvoter May 20, 2013 at 10:24 pm
I know what the word increase means! You mentioned it above about insurance rates going up. You seeRead More when a member of the BOE gives his kid a job in the district, then that adult child (24 yrs) takes a 15 yr old student to a hotel for sex and gets arrested, then our insurance company has to pay to settle the lawsuit, dont you think our insurance rates go up John. Sure you dont believe it - Read all about it http://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/cops-commack-hs-coach-faces-sex-abuse-charges-1.1711455 Time to break up this 5 member coffee clotch and their you scratch my back I will scratch yours.
John Smith May 20, 2013 at 10:12 pm
Can I ask you an honest question? I hope this doesn't sound to condescending because I really amRead More curious. Do you understand what the word "increase" means?
Judge for your yourself whether these signatures were written by the same person
COM-MOM May 22, 2013 at 09:39 pm
P.S. LaJa. Is LaJa short for Laura James?? Are you Dr. James' wife??
COM-MOM May 22, 2013 at 09:00 pm
Yes, I voted for Steve H. and Jim T. I also voted in favor of prop 2. Maybe I am uninformed aboutRead More when the contract extentions and raises are voted on, because the agenda is purposely ambiguous. Hopefully, Steve and Jim will change all that and votes and meetings will become more transparent. LaJa, are you and "Honest Commackian" friends? You have similar arrogant styles and bullying techniques.
Concerned Commackian May 22, 2013 at 08:46 pm
@LaJa. Still squaking? Game's over. Your team lost. Please arrive home safely.
Concerned Commackian May 20, 2013 at 03:45 pm
Im concerned with the rate of spending increases. You cant talk your way around them no matter howRead More hard you try. And as to this "district has no control" argument, thats a cop out and you know it. While the state tells the district what percentage of salary it must pay into the retirement system, if the district had done a more effective job of limiting the growth in compensation, not only would salary expense been lower, but the amount paid into the retirement system would have been lower as well. And John, care to calculate how much the additional state aid to the district this year lowered the levy? Im sure you dont.
John Smith May 20, 2013 at 02:19 pm
Or you could think about how spending is going up over 4% (the majority of which is fueled by costsRead More that are mandated by law -- Teachers' and Employee's Retirement and Insurance contributions -- over which the School District has no control), but the tax levy is only going up 2.91%, which means the School District -- gasp -- might be doing a good job finding alternative sources of funding other than the taxpayers. Again, look at the info for yourself, not through the eyes of a biased Tampellini/Hartman/Tax Pac supporter.
LaJa May 21, 2013 at 10:41 am
Perhaps you can double down your efforts in Lisa Levine's current town of residence. See how thingsRead More work out there for about 5-7 years. Send us a report and we will take it under advisement. Communities working together!
LaJa May 21, 2013 at 10:38 am
As usual the TaxPac group resorts to name-calling and bullying. Much like the school yard loud mouthRead More who simply could not get the other kids to agree with him. Must be getting increasingly frustrating to all of you. Year after year you try to break onto our community intent on doing damage and year after year you are turned away at the gates. Perhaps it's time to pack up and retreat.
TheRube43 May 21, 2013 at 08:53 am
Something jumps out at me. "We don't want to spend down our unrestricted reserves or we willRead More be like Sachem. But if the district doesn't over budget line items then they have no choice but to spend those reserves. Things happen during a school year - whether it is a special ed student moving in or a superstorm causing all sort of havoc. So the district has to overbudget so they have enough for those contingincies.". We have a contingency fund for emergencies. Things DO happen. We spend from the contingency fund. Next budget, we replenish the fund. We never let the fund diminish past the year it was tapped. Overbudgeting for "more emergencies" seems wasteful. People would understand if there was a budget increase due to a catastrophic emergency - enough to cover the dip into the contingency fund. And where is it spelled out what's "budget" and what's "overbudget" for each line item?? I'm not trying to be snarky - I'm just trying to get a handle on things.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 10:54 am
Now, this morning, I hear that the PTA is telling people that they are opposed to Proposition 2 inRead More order to keep "special interest groups" from taking over. How can parents in this community, whose children are in the system, who want to make positive change for those children, be a "special interest group"? It blows my mind, how in politics, people can twist things so badly to meet their own agendas. It is all quite sad.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 08:20 am
Last night, I had quite the email exchange with members of the PTA Executive Committee. Not onlyRead More could they NOT provide me with an answer as to why they've chosen not to support Proposition 2, all I received was snide remarks and avoidance. Not smart or professional at all. In fact, they seem like quite the joke. I guess they are more of a social club who makes decisions about an important vote without doing their homework and then pushes that decision on the community (via street signs and phone calls to parents). I believe the public deserves a valid answer as to why they've taken their position. Unfortunately, they can't provide one. It makes me ponder if I should even bother to support the PTA in the future (as I have in the past with both my time and money). They certainly don't seem to be making decisions in the best interest of our children. It is all quite sad.
Commackvoter May 19, 2013 at 11:28 am
Yes John Smith, agree that the PTA SHOULD have video taped and posted it somewhere for the communityRead More to view. This is the 21st century and there is no excuse for them not offering this for those who could not attend. Same goes for the CUFSD but at least the law prohibits them from banning taping public meetings.