.
Feedback

POLL: Should Tanning Salons Allow Teens Under 17?

If a New York bill is passed, teenagers ages 16 and under will be prohibited from accessing tanning beds.

A bill pending in Albany may prohibit teenagers in Commack from using indoor tanning booths.

The measure, which has already passed the State Assembly, and is expected to be approved by the State Senate, prohibits anyone 16 or younger from using an indoor tanning booth.

Senator Charles J. Fuschillo, R-Merrick, who sponsored the bill in the Senate, is looking to Gov. Andrew Cuomo to sign it.

Children between the ages of 14 and 17 are currently allowed to tan in machine-generated ultraviolet radiation with parental consent.

The bill’s supporters, including the American Cancer Society, cite evidence that excessive exposure to UV radiation can cause skin cancer. Excessive tanning among children made national headlines when Patricia Krentcil was charged with child endangerment in New Jersey, after she was accused of taking her daughter, then 5, into a tanning booth. She denied the charges.

Tanning has also been glorified on popular shows such as MTV's "The Jersey Shore." Nicole “Snooki" Polizzi was slammed after she announced on "The Jay Leno Show" that she'd like to change the world by installing tanning beds "in everybody's homes."

The American Cancer Society, said that the dangers of indoor tanning were serious enough that even parental permission is irrelevant when it comes to teenagers.

“Society would never allow a 14-year-old to go buy cigarettes with parental consent,” said Blair Horner, a vice president at the American Cancer Society of New York and New Jersey, told the New York Times.

Assemblyman Harvey Weisenberg, D-Long Beach, who is the bill’s Assembly sponsor and a longtime lifeguard, told the Times he and other Democrats wanted 17-year-olds banned from tanning salons but that Republicans’ concerns about the economic effects on salons led to a compromise admitting them, with parental consent.

California is the only state that bans the use of tanning beds for all minors under 18, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

This new state legislation could have a major impact on teenagers in Commack especially as teens seek a summer glow for prom and graduation. What do you think of the bill? Should those 16 and under be allowed in a tanning booth? Leave your thoughts in our Poll and comments section below.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Commack Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Commackvoter May 19, 2013 at 11:28 am
Yes John Smith, agree that the PTA SHOULD have video taped and posted it somewhere for the communityRead More to view. This is the 21st century and there is no excuse for them not offering this for those who could not attend. Same goes for the CUFSD but at least the law prohibits them from banning taping public meetings.
MJS May 19, 2013 at 10:29 am
It will be interesting to see what Mr. Behar does if he loses, since he is totally opposed to PropRead More 2. So if Prop 2 passes, and he chooses to take advantage of it and run again then in my eyes, and those of the Community, he will reveal himself to be a total Hypocrite. The same would go for Egan, since he too opposes Prop 2.
Retired May 19, 2013 at 08:45 am
Hey John - No one is being slick. You incorrectly assumed that it was suspicious that there was noRead More video tape of the meet the candidates night. I can understand why you would think that but the fact is that the PTA did not allow any video. I wish video could have been done so the community could have seen each candidate themselves and make their own assessment. If you don't believe what I say just contact the PTA and confirm it with them....
MJS May 19, 2013 at 10:29 am
It will be interesting to see what Mr. Behar does if he loses, since he is totally opposed to PropRead More 2. So if Prop 2 passes, and he chooses to take advantage of it and run again then in my eyes, and those of the Community, he will reveal himself to be a total Hypocrite. The same would go for Egan, since he too opposes Prop 2.
Retired May 19, 2013 at 09:52 am
@RL - I agree with term limits, but the law says that can only be proposed by the Board. The publicRead More cannot submit such a proposition. The board, at least the current one, will never agree to that b/c they want to keep themselves in power at any cost. By adding 2 new people Prop 2 may a provide an opportunity to have people on aboard that will consider proposing term limits, as well as other changes. So, yet another reason to Vote YES to Prop 2.
RL May 17, 2013 at 08:08 am
I agree new blood can be used and some new thinking and the way to accomplish that is to vote newRead More faces in. Does having more people create a larger bureaucracy thought. Having served on a number of private, charity and corporate boards I can tell you more is not always the answer. I think term limits would be a better approach. This way you don't have the same though process year after year. Two terms six years seems reasonably to me.
Concerned Commackian May 18, 2013 at 09:18 pm
Commack Parent is right. Its definately a costRead More issue.....BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!!! Thanks Parent, that was the best chuckle ive had all day!
LINANA May 17, 2013 at 12:28 am
Since past precedence for a number of years has been to send out literature informing ALL residentsRead More (including those with no children in the schools) of candidates bios, does the omission of the bios raise a legal issue? ??? We all pay school taxes and district has the obligation to provide us with this info. Shame on them!!!! Teacher's union is also "encouraging" votes for Egan & Behar and against adding two additional seats to the board. People with a vested interest "encouraging" you to vote a particular way should raise flags!!! Hopefully people will think for themselves and make an informed vote for the candidate they feel will best represent the students & residents of Commack.
Janice May 16, 2013 at 12:08 pm
IT does raise a red flag! I think it IS definitely time to vote for some new folks. I am going toRead More check out Hartman and Tampellini's bios. If I like what I see, I am voting for change
MJS May 19, 2013 at 10:28 am
It will be interesting to see what Mr. Behar does if he loses, since he is totally opposed to PropRead More 2. So if Prop 2 passes, and he chooses to take advantage of it and run again then in my eyes, and those of the Community, he will reveal himself to be a total Hypocrite. The same would go for Egan, since he too opposes Prop 2.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 15, 2013 at 09:02 pm
Doing my best. Please spread the word. Thanks!
GM May 15, 2013 at 08:30 pm
You go Girl! Spread the word. It's less than a week until we vote and you can quickly educate usingRead More social media.
ergodic May 16, 2013 at 11:09 am
Hey, PTA, BOE/// try lending a hand///don't criticize things you don't understand///the community isRead More clearly beyond your command///your 100 year road is rapidly aging///and, the times, they are changing. CUFSD has experienced a decline in total enrollment from a peak of 7830 in 2008-09 to 6934 (projected) in 2013-14, a decrease of 11.4%. During that period, spending per pupil increased from $19,759 to $25,871 - an increase of 30.9%. This performance does not reflect well on the financial management capabilities of the BOE. And, is it a surprise that NYSUT is an advocate for the status quo? A more democratic approach to decision-making via a vote for Prop 2 should be helpful.
re May 16, 2013 at 12:01 am
Vote yes for the additional members of the board. Save our schools. Save our schools with fairRead More representation. Join a new taxpayers representation committee at the Commack community assoc effective September 2013. Our next meeting is May 30 at 7pm at the Bristol assisted living community room( next to sears) Do not let this civic group wither away as it would be a victory for the school board that monitors any opposition to the way the district operates.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 15, 2013 at 08:27 pm
I started a Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/VoteYesForProposition2?skip_nax_wizard=true