.
Feedback

Commack Boys Soccer Roars Past Huntington, 2-1

Cougars earn first-round playoff win by possessing ball and pressing the attack against Huntington.

They're growing up fast in . A sophomore and junior with one goal between them during the regular season came off the bench on Tuesday to provide all the offense for the Cougars boys soccer team.

Commack roared past Huntington, 2-1, in the first round of the Suffolk Class AA playoffs, and sophomore Jake Foley and junior midfielder Matt Tamburello each scored crucial first-half goals for the difference.

Trailing 1-0 early, Commack first-year coach Pat Friel pulled Foley and Tamburello off the bench and each paid diviends with big goals. Foley scored in the 13th minute.

"[Foley] put a goal in the back of the net and our team settled down," Friel said.

Tamburello struck 3 minutes later to put Commack in front for good. Junior Jake Amereno made six saves in goal for the Cougars. No. 15 Huntington (9-8), which won its final four games just to qualify for the playoffs, couldn't answer.

"They're a good team," Foley said. "We just had to keep our composure."

No. 2 Commack (15-1-1) hosts No. 10 Northport in a quarterfinal Friday at 2:30 p.m. The Tigers needed overtime to beat host Newfield, 3-2.

Hero: Sophomore Jake Foley picked a heck of a moment to score his first varsity goal. After watching Huntington raced to a 1-0 lead from the bench, Foley entered the game and promptly scored the equalizer with 27:38 left in the first half. His high rising blast to the left corner of the net from 15 yards out came off a throw in.

"He put a goal in the back of the net and our team settled down," Friel said.

For his part, Foley said instinct took over. "I just took a crank at it," Foley said. "I knew there were people in the box, so if the goalie fumbled it someone might get it. So I took the shot."

Turning Point: Junior forward and co-captain Jack Miller fed Foley on the first goal and earned the ultimate assist on the second with his sliding cross from the extreme right corner, just outside the box.

The ball sailed across the mouth of the goal and found the eager foot of junior midfielder Matt Tamburello camping next to the left post. Tamburello redirected the ball into the net for a 2-1 Commack edge with 24 minutes left in the opening half.

"I've been in a drought," Tamburello said. "Hopefully this sparks me in the playoffs."

Quotable: "The first couple of rounds in the playoffs are dangerous,'' Friel said. "You have a team going 110 percent against you. It was important to get a few goals in. We could have had seven or eight. But two got in and we settled down and let our skill set take over."

Bottom Line: Commack played like the No. 2 seed, controlling the tempo and possessing the ball. The Cougars had one miscue on defense and Huntington made them pay. But the reality was that Commack dominated. And to get a pair of goals from players who entered the day with one goal on the season between them? That's priceless. 

Key Stat: The Cougars pelted the Huntington goal. For every one of the 16 saves Blue Devils keeper E.J. Connell recorded, Commack fired just as many wide or high of the net.

Who's Next: Suffolk Class AA quarterfinal Northport @ Commack, Friday, 2:30 p.m.

Boys Soccer: Suffolk Class AA First Round 

Teams..................1.....2 -- F

Huntington..........1.....0 -- 1

Commack............2.....0 -- 2

Goals -- H: Velasquez; C: Foley, Tamburello. Saves -- H: Connell 16; C:Amereno 6.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Commack Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Retired May 22, 2013 at 01:17 pm
Congrats to Jim and Steve, but most off all congrats to the Commack Community for having the wisdomRead More to elect them.
MJS May 22, 2013 at 10:10 am
Get ready Mary Jo, Dr. James, CTA, and PTA.. Change is Coming!
GM May 21, 2013 at 11:29 pm
Well run Gentlemen! Get some sleep now.... you guys have a lot of work to do.
LaJa May 21, 2013 at 09:03 pm
They change the name occasionally but they are and will always be TaxPac
LaJa May 21, 2013 at 09:02 pm
Simply stating that you are not aware of who you are supporting is ecactly why the rest of us areRead More relentless in our efforts to keep them out of our community. For the sake of your kids, your property value and future (both near and distant) research this Group. You will be shocked to read the Exact words used by the group you support in TaxPac literature. Then read about the effects of their policies on the communities the infiltrate. And how long it takes these communities to recover once they are all voted out of office.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 04:45 pm
LaJa. First, I don't hide behind initials or some fake name. I can't take you seriously when youRead More won't reveal who you really are. Secondly, I am not part of any group whatsoever. I do not need others telling me how to think. There ARE citizens in this town who are not happy with the current board and their ways, who do not need to be part of an organization of some sort to try and initiate change. Finally, it's funny you accuse me of being a part of something that I don't even know what it is. I've never heard of TaxPac in my life.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 08:18 am
Last night, I had quite the email exchange with members of the PTA Executive Committee. Not onlyRead More could they NOT provide me with an answer as to why they've chosen not to support Proposition 2, all I received was snide remarks and avoidance. Not smart or professional at all. In fact, they seem like quite the joke. I guess they are more of a social club who makes decisions about an important vote without doing their homework and then pushes that decision on the community (via street signs and phone calls to parents). I believe the public deserves a valid answer as to why they've taken their position. Unfortunately, they can't provide one. It makes me ponder if I should even bother to support the PTA in the future (as I have in the past with both my time and money). They certainly don't seem to be making decisions in the best interest of our children. It is all quite sad.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 10:53 am
Last night, I had quite the email exchange with members of the PTA Executive Committee. Not onlyRead More could they NOT provide me with an answer as to why they've chosen not to support Proposition 2, all I received was snide remarks and avoidance. Not smart or professional at all. In fact, they seem like quite the joke. I guess they are more of a social club who makes decisions about an important vote without doing their homework and then pushes that decision on the community (via street signs and phone calls to parents). I believe the public deserves a valid answer as to why they've taken their position. Unfortunately, they can't provide one. It makes me ponder if I should even bother to support the PTA in the future (as I have in the past with both my time and money). They certainly don't seem to be making decisions in the best interest of our children. Now, this morning, I hear that the PTA is telling people that they are opposed to Proposition 2 in order to keep "special interest groups" from taking over. How can parents in this community, whose children are in the system, who want to make positive change for those children, be a "special interest group"? It blows my mind, how in politics, people can twist things so badly to meet their own agendas. It is all quite sad.
Concerned Commackian May 21, 2013 at 01:34 pm
Whatever you say LaJa......whatever you say. Where is the sneaking around? Wasnt everything doneRead More according to the law? I think your goal is sensatuionalism rather than serious debate.
LaJa May 21, 2013 at 11:12 am
By the way, I am not in any way associated or affiliated with any union... If you and your groupRead More are not affiliated with TaxPac then you should know that the platform Tampellini and Hartman support, along with the sudden urgent need for 2 more board seats, is taken straight from the TaxPac play book. You can agree with them, as that is your right BUT you must also know where their rhetoric originates and educate yourselves as to what TaxPac as a group wants here on Long Island. If the TaxPac agenda was above board and positive for LI communities there would be no need for them to sneak around and attempt to gain entry into communities through back-door maneuvers like the sudden need for 2 more seats...when Fusco couldn't get in last year either..... At least know that you are being played.
Concerned Commackian May 21, 2013 at 10:39 am
Is TAXPAC a word often used by Union Shills?
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 08:19 am
Last night, I had quite the email exchange with members of the PTA Executive Committee. Not onlyRead More could they NOT provide me with an answer as to why they've chosen not to support Proposition 2, all I received was snide remarks and avoidance. Not smart or professional at all. In fact, they seem like quite the joke. I guess they are more of a social club who makes decisions about an important vote without doing their homework and then pushes that decision on the community (via street signs and phone calls to parents). I believe the public deserves a valid answer as to why they've taken their position. Unfortunately, they can't provide one. It makes me ponder if I should even bother to support the PTA in the future (as I have in the past with both my time and money). They certainly don't seem to be making decisions in the best interest of our children. It is all quite sad.
Commackvoter May 20, 2013 at 10:24 pm
I know what the word increase means! You mentioned it above about insurance rates going up. You seeRead More when a member of the BOE gives his kid a job in the district, then that adult child (24 yrs) takes a 15 yr old student to a hotel for sex and gets arrested, then our insurance company has to pay to settle the lawsuit, dont you think our insurance rates go up John. Sure you dont believe it - Read all about it http://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/cops-commack-hs-coach-faces-sex-abuse-charges-1.1711455 Time to break up this 5 member coffee clotch and their you scratch my back I will scratch yours.
John Smith May 20, 2013 at 10:12 pm
Can I ask you an honest question? I hope this doesn't sound to condescending because I really amRead More curious. Do you understand what the word "increase" means?
Judge for your yourself whether these signatures were written by the same person
Retired May 22, 2013 at 01:16 pm
I guess the author of this moronic post did not even consider the fact that the District ClerkRead More validated all the signatures on the Petition before approving it. Believe me if there was a way to have bounced this Petition so as to avoid have to present it for a public vote then the Board/District would have surely found it... So the fact that they did not shows it was totally legit. Although it is now irrelevant that Prop 2 did not pass... wait till next year!!
LaJa May 22, 2013 at 11:23 am
Once again I state, the ill educated and foul mouthed folks in our community want their turn at batRead More and we have to give it to them. Even when we know the results will be detrimental to the Community at large because that IS the democratic process.
LaJa May 22, 2013 at 11:12 am
It appears the ill educated and foul-mouthed members of our community want their turn at bat and weRead More must give it to them. Returning this district to its abysmal academic standards found in the 80's may save you a Buck or two but will do nothing for your property value and for the lower bar you set for your own kids. They are the ones that have to compete with kids from other districts with higher academic standards than you want here. Colleges, Universities and the job market will respond in kind... A Community Is as A Community Does..
Concerned Commackian May 20, 2013 at 03:45 pm
Im concerned with the rate of spending increases. You cant talk your way around them no matter howRead More hard you try. And as to this "district has no control" argument, thats a cop out and you know it. While the state tells the district what percentage of salary it must pay into the retirement system, if the district had done a more effective job of limiting the growth in compensation, not only would salary expense been lower, but the amount paid into the retirement system would have been lower as well. And John, care to calculate how much the additional state aid to the district this year lowered the levy? Im sure you dont.
John Smith May 20, 2013 at 02:19 pm
Or you could think about how spending is going up over 4% (the majority of which is fueled by costsRead More that are mandated by law -- Teachers' and Employee's Retirement and Insurance contributions -- over which the School District has no control), but the tax levy is only going up 2.91%, which means the School District -- gasp -- might be doing a good job finding alternative sources of funding other than the taxpayers. Again, look at the info for yourself, not through the eyes of a biased Tampellini/Hartman/Tax Pac supporter.
LaJa May 21, 2013 at 10:41 am
Perhaps you can double down your efforts in Lisa Levine's current town of residence. See how thingsRead More work out there for about 5-7 years. Send us a report and we will take it under advisement. Communities working together!
LaJa May 21, 2013 at 10:38 am
As usual the TaxPac group resorts to name-calling and bullying. Much like the school yard loud mouthRead More who simply could not get the other kids to agree with him. Must be getting increasingly frustrating to all of you. Year after year you try to break onto our community intent on doing damage and year after year you are turned away at the gates. Perhaps it's time to pack up and retreat.
TheRube43 May 21, 2013 at 08:53 am
Something jumps out at me. "We don't want to spend down our unrestricted reserves or we willRead More be like Sachem. But if the district doesn't over budget line items then they have no choice but to spend those reserves. Things happen during a school year - whether it is a special ed student moving in or a superstorm causing all sort of havoc. So the district has to overbudget so they have enough for those contingincies.". We have a contingency fund for emergencies. Things DO happen. We spend from the contingency fund. Next budget, we replenish the fund. We never let the fund diminish past the year it was tapped. Overbudgeting for "more emergencies" seems wasteful. People would understand if there was a budget increase due to a catastrophic emergency - enough to cover the dip into the contingency fund. And where is it spelled out what's "budget" and what's "overbudget" for each line item?? I'm not trying to be snarky - I'm just trying to get a handle on things.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 10:54 am
Now, this morning, I hear that the PTA is telling people that they are opposed to Proposition 2 inRead More order to keep "special interest groups" from taking over. How can parents in this community, whose children are in the system, who want to make positive change for those children, be a "special interest group"? It blows my mind, how in politics, people can twist things so badly to meet their own agendas. It is all quite sad.
Dawn-Marie Bailey May 21, 2013 at 08:20 am
Last night, I had quite the email exchange with members of the PTA Executive Committee. Not onlyRead More could they NOT provide me with an answer as to why they've chosen not to support Proposition 2, all I received was snide remarks and avoidance. Not smart or professional at all. In fact, they seem like quite the joke. I guess they are more of a social club who makes decisions about an important vote without doing their homework and then pushes that decision on the community (via street signs and phone calls to parents). I believe the public deserves a valid answer as to why they've taken their position. Unfortunately, they can't provide one. It makes me ponder if I should even bother to support the PTA in the future (as I have in the past with both my time and money). They certainly don't seem to be making decisions in the best interest of our children. It is all quite sad.
Commackvoter May 19, 2013 at 11:28 am
Yes John Smith, agree that the PTA SHOULD have video taped and posted it somewhere for the communityRead More to view. This is the 21st century and there is no excuse for them not offering this for those who could not attend. Same goes for the CUFSD but at least the law prohibits them from banning taping public meetings.